Соединённое Короле́вство: Find a Tender Service

The dataset has quality issues to take into account, notably:

• Some tenders and awards from the same contracting process are published under different OCIDs. In these cases, you may need fall-back to matching tenders and awards using other fields like buyer, title and value.
• Organization identifiers are not provided for most buyers and suppliers in the data, in these cases you may need to fall-back to using organization names to identify organizations.
• For contracting processes with multiple lots and with non-unique award and contract identifiers, only one award and contract are reported in the OCDS data. The suppliers for all lots are listed in awards/suppliers, however for titles, values, dates and all other scalar fields of awards and contracts, only the values from the last award or contract are reported. In these cases, it is not possible to determine which lots resulted in an award, which supplier won each lot or the value of the award for each lot.
• Some date fields are incorrectly formatted. In these cases you may need to cast dates to the correct format:
  • tender/milestones/dueDate
  • tender/tenderPeriod/endDate
  • tender/milestones/dueDate

The dataset has minor issues that should not interfere with most uses. They include:

• In some cases, the tender/awardCriteria field is incorrectly formatted as an object rather than a string, for example: awardCriteria": {"criteria": [{"name": "Lowest price","type": "price"}]}
• For contract award notices with multiple lots and that are related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds, the relatedLots property is missing from some planning/budget/finance objects.